Wednesday, June 25, 2014

Al Jazeera tells hunters not to fight for gun rights

From the above mentioned attempts to define "armor-piercing" ammunition in such a way as to net all centerfire rifle ammunition, to the Violence Policy Center's efforts to have accurate bolt-action rifles banned as "sniper rifles," to the International Action Network on Small Arms' (IANSA) call for a ban of all rifles that can kill at 100 meters (all rifles, in other words), hunting guns may be toward the end of the list of gun ban zealots' ambitions, but they are on it, and if we gun rights advocates have been taken out of the picture, who will speak for you, hunters?

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

Try us, camel jockeys, and we'll annihilate you!

Anonymous said...

I'll jizz here can go bugger off.

Anonymous said...

I saw this hit piece it is complete propaganda and judging by the content produced by a non-American it is laugh-out-loud ignorant but some LoFo will doubtless take it to heart.
BTW are there any Americans still working for AJ?

Anonymous said...

they always try the "divide and conquer" routine. It's getting old for those who spot it. If Elmer Fudd can't spot it then i do believe he's in an extremely small minority.

Anonymous said...

It's just like open carry advocates. If the concealed carriers push out the open carriers, and the loyalist THEN go to the letter of the case law, concealed IS at present a PERMISSION based ALLOWANCE. And when they decided "shall issue" is akin to shall not be infringed (as in kinda sorta sometimes instead of PERIOD) the who will speak for carry?

The FOOLS of the country endlessly willing to compromise trying to win hearts and minds do more damage than those trying to outright ban guns altogether.

Wake up you dolts and see that the ONLY way to stop the infringing is to refuse the "compromises".

Anonymous said...

I have special loads with Bacon Bits inserted into the hollow-points.

Edwin III